1888PressRelease.com
1888 PressRelease Home Sign In Sign Up Contact Us About Us Sitemap
24
Mar
2007

Investors: Don't Overlook The Humble Terrace

In a piece of news that may come as a surprise to some investors, it has emerged that the property that would have brought the best returns over the last ten years is the humble terraced house. Data collected by a building society has found that, on average, terraced houses have enjoyed more growth in value than any other form of property.


(1888PressRelease) March 24, 2007 - In fact, the average terraced property has more than tripled in value over the last decade, according to Halifax, seeing growth of around 229 per cent. Such properties are an attractive proposition for any investor, but especially those in the buy-to-let market, with rental income streams being underpinned by a good profit on resale, which would almost certainly be both quick and at market value or above, given the paucity of available properties on the market at the moment.

Terraces date back to the 17th century, when the term was first used to describe streets consisting of houses of a uniform height and appearance.

Originally, terraces were built for the gentry in affluent areas of London such as Belgrave Square. These were often designed so the whole row would appear to be one building, based on a Georgian palace, with the central houses usually having columns or pillars outside.

Terraced houses as we think of them today did not emerge until the Victorian period. With the industrial boom, a vast influx of new arrivals to the city needed housing, usually in close proximity to the industrial areas where they worked. Terraced housing was fixed upon as a solution and quickly spread throughout the UK. It was the chosen form of high density housing until the post-World War II period.

Despite the fact that many terraced houses are relatively old, research conducted in 2005 by English Heritage found that upkeep costs on a standard Victorian terraced house over a 30 year period are around 60 per cent lower than the cost of building and maintaining a new house.

A study undertaken in 2003 by Heritage Counts compared a Victorian terrace to a standard house built after 1980. the subsequent report concluded that "older housing actually costs less to maintain and occupy over the long-term life of the dwelling than more modern housing." This was attributed to "the quality and life-span of the materials used", which makes the Victorian terraced house "almost £1,000 per 100 m2 cheaper to maintain and inhabit on average each year".

So, with steady growth in value, favourable maintenance costs and the fact that many are, given their history as high-density housing, located near to town and city centres, terraced properties are certainly not to be overlooked by the canny investor.
 

Other Related Press Releases

GolfClubsHome.com Introduces The Power Max Revelation Hybrid Iron Set by Golfclubshome.com

MusoCity.com - New Online Music Community Launches by Musocity.com

DSA Appoints General Manager Of DC Operations by Data Systems Analysts

Investors: Don't Overlook The Humble Terrace by Assetz

Richmond Pedestrians On Universityhouse Channel March 27 by John Z Wetmore, Producer, Perils For Pedestrians Television

Advertising And Business Opportunities Available In The New Voice123 by Voice123

New Tips On How To Find Voice Over Work Online by Voice123

Contact Information

Jimwatson

Assetz

Voice: 0845 400 7000

Visit our Site